Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
JAMA ; 328(16): 1585-1586, 2022 10 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2084336

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint discusses 3 areas in need of progress regarding societal approaches to pandemics and other health threats: a renaissance in public health; robustness of primary health care; and resilience of individuals and communities, with higher levels of trust in government and society.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Pandemics , Public Health , Quality Improvement , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health/methods , Public Health/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Quality Improvement/standards , Disaster Planning/methods , Disaster Planning/standards
4.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(2): e22790, 2021 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1574794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the leading causes of pregnancy-related death. Prenatal health care providers can offer critical screening and support to pregnant people who experience IPV. During the COVID-19 shelter-in-place order, mobile apps may offer such people the opportunity to continue receiving screening and support services. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine cases of IPV that were reported on a prenatal care app before and during the implementation of COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates. METHODS: The number of patients who underwent voluntary IPV screening and the incidence rate of IPV were determined by using a prenatal care app that was disseminated to patients from a single, large health care system. We compared the IPV screening frequencies and IPV incidence rates of patients who started using the app before the COVID-19 shelter-in-place order, to those of patients who started using the app during the shelter-in-place order. RESULTS: We found 552 patients who started using the app within 60 days prior to the enforcement of the shelter-in-place order, and 407 patients who used the app at the start of shelter-in-place enforcement until the order was lifted. The incidence rates of voluntary IPV screening for new app users during the two time periods were similar (before sheltering in place: 252/552, 46%; during sheltering in place: 163/407, 40%). The overall use of the IPV screening tool increased during the shelter-in-place order. A slight, nonsignificant increase in the incidence of physical, sexual, and psychological violence during the shelter-in-place order was found across all app users (P=.56). Notably, none of the patients who screened positively for IPV had mentions of IPV in their medical charts. CONCLUSIONS: App-based screening for IPV is feasible during times when in-person access to health care providers is limited. Our results suggest that the incidence of IPV slightly increased during the shelter-in-place order. App-based screening may also address the needs of those who are unwilling or unable to share their IPV experiences with their health care provider.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Emergency Shelter/methods , Intimate Partner Violence/psychology , Quality Improvement/standards , Remote Consultation/methods , Telemedicine/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Acad Med ; 96(11): 1560-1563, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1310946

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: American Indians and Alaska Natives hold a state-conferred right to health, yet significant health and health care disparities persist. Academic medical centers are resource-rich institutions committed to public service, yet few are engaged in responsive, equitable, and lasting tribal health partnerships to address these challenges. APPROACH: Maniilaq Association, a rural and remote tribal health organization in Northwest Alaska, partnered with Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School to address health care needs through physician staffing, training, and quality improvement initiatives. This partnership, called Siamit, falls under tribal governance, focuses on supporting community health leaders, addresses challenges shaped by extreme geographic remoteness, and advances the mission of academic medicine in the context of tribal health priorities. OUTCOMES: Throughout the 2019-2020 academic year, Siamit augmented local physician staffing, mentored health professions trainees, provided continuing medical education courses, implemented quality improvement initiatives, and provided clinical care and operational support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Siamit began with a small budget and limited human resources, demonstrating that relatively small investments in academic-tribal health partnerships can support meaningful and positive outcomes. NEXT STEPS: During the 2020-2021 academic year, the authors plan to expand Siamit's efforts with a broader social medicine curriculum, additional attending staff, more frequent trainee rotations, an increasingly robust mentorship network for Indigenous health professions trainees, and further study of the impact of these efforts. Such partnerships may be replicable in other settings and represent a significant opportunity to advance community health priorities, strengthen tribal health systems, support the next generation of Indigenous health leaders, and carry out the academic medicine mission of teaching, research, and service.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Intersectoral Collaboration , Alaska/epidemiology , Alaskan Natives/ethnology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Curriculum , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Indians, North American/ethnology , Public Health/trends , Quality Improvement/standards , Rural Population , SARS-CoV-2/growth & development , Workforce
6.
Clin Biochem ; 95: 1-12, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1242901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A consensus guidance is provided for testing, utility and verification of SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test (POCT) performance and implementation of a quality management program, focusing on nucleic acid and antigen targeted technologies. DESIGN AND METHODS: The recommendations are based on current literature and expert opinion from the members of Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists (CSCC), and are intended for use inside or outside of healthcare settings that have varied levels of expertise and experience with POCT. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Here we discuss sampling requirements, biosafety, SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care testing methodologies (with focus on Health Canada approved tests), test performance and limitations, test selection, testing utility, development and implementation of quality management systems, quality improvement, and medical and scientific oversight.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Consensus , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Societies, Scientific/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/genetics , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Qualitative Research , Quality Improvement/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
7.
Psychiatr Serv ; 72(1): 86-88, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1060599

ABSTRACT

To address the global mental health crisis exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, an urgent need has emerged to transform the accessibility, efficiency, and quality of mental health care. The next suite of efforts to transform mental health care must foster the implementation of "learning organizations," that is, organizations that continuously improve patient-centered care through ongoing data collection. The concept of learning organizations is highly regarded, but the key features of such organizations, particularly those providing mental health care, are less well defined. Using telepsychiatry care as an example, the authors of this Open Forum concretely describe the key building blocks for operationalizing a learning organization in mental health care to set a research agenda for services transformation.


Subject(s)
Data Collection , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Psychiatry/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Data Collection/standards , Health Services Research/standards , Humans , Implementation Science , Mental Health Services/standards , Organizations , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Psychiatry/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Stakeholder Participation , Telemedicine/standards
9.
Glob Health Sci Pract ; 8(4): 689-698, 2020 12 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1000593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Providing professional development opportunities to staff working in clinical laboratories undergoing quality improvement programs can be challenged by limited funding, particularly in resource-limited countries such as Cambodia. Using innovative approaches such as video conferencing can connect mentors with practitioners regardless of location. This study describes and evaluates the methods, outputs, and outcomes of a quality improvement program implemented in 12 public hospital laboratories in Cambodia between January 2018 and April 2019. The program used mixed intervention methods including both in-person and remote-access training and mentorship. METHODS: Training outputs were quantified from the activity reports of program trainers and mentors. Program outcomes were measured by pre- and postimplementation audits of laboratory quality management system conformity to international standards. Variations in improved outcomes were assessed in relation to the time spent by laboratory personnel in video conference training and mentoring activity. An additional cross-sectional comparison described the difference in final audit scores between participating and nonparticipating laboratories. RESULTS: Laboratories significantly improved their audit scores over the project period, showing significant improvement in all sections of the ISO 15189 standard. Pre- and postaudit score differences and laboratory personnel participation time in remote mentoring activities showed a strong monotonic relationship. Average input per laboratory was 6,027±2,454 minutes of participation in video conference activities with mentors. Audit scores of participating laboratories were significantly higher than those of laboratories with no quality improvement program. CONCLUSION: Laboratories improved significantly in ISO 15189 conformity following structured laboratory quality management systems training supported by remote and on-site mentoring. The correlation of laboratory participation in video conference activities highlights the utility of remote video conferencing technology to strengthen laboratories in resource-limited settings and to build communities of practice to address quality improvement issues in health care. These findings are particularly relevant in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Laboratories/organization & administration , Mentoring/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Videoconferencing/organization & administration , Cambodia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Laboratories/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Staff Development/organization & administration , United States
10.
J Nurs Care Qual ; 36(1): 1-6, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-955732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nurse-sensitive quality indicators have historically been used as a metric of nursing care quality in health care organizations. PROBLEM: At our academic medical center, critically ill COVID-19 patients led to a dramatic change in the organizational standard of care resulting in an increase in nurse-sensitive health care-associated infections. APPROACH: Nursing performance improvement teams provided the structure for development of innovative strategies implemented in real time by our frontline clinicians to address the quality and safety issues found with these elevated health care-associated infections. OUTCOMES: A new COVID-19 CLABSI (central line-associated bloodstream infection) Tip Sheet and a Prone Positioning Kit for HAPI Prevention are strategies developed to address quality of care issues experienced with the COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Deployment of these innovative practice strategies has led to a decline in health care-associated infections and instituted a new care standard for the COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Quality Improvement/standards , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Anesthesiology ; 133(5): 985-996, 2020 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-709139

ABSTRACT

Preparedness measures for the anticipated surge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases within eastern Massachusetts included the establishment of alternate care sites (field hospitals). Boston Hope hospital was set up within the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center to provide low-acuity care for COVID-19 patients and to support local healthcare systems. However, early recognition of the need to provide higher levels of care, or critical care for the potential deterioration of patients recovering from COVID-19, prompted the development of a hybrid acute care-intensive care unit. We describe our experience of implementing rapid response capabilities of this innovative ad hoc unit. Combining quality improvement tools for hazards detection and testing through in situ simulation successfully identified several operational hurdles. Through rapid continuous analysis and iterative change, we implemented appropriate mitigation strategies and established rapid response and rescue capabilities. This study provides a framework for future planning of high-acuity services within a unique field hospital setting.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Computer Simulation/standards , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis/standards , Hospital Rapid Response Team/standards , Intensive Care Units/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Boston/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/standards , Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis/methods , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Program Development/methods , Program Development/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , SARS-CoV-2
12.
J Hosp Infect ; 105(4): 710-716, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-668185

ABSTRACT

The rapid growth of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, limited availability of personal protective equipment, and uncertainties regarding transmission modes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 have heightened concerns for the safety of healthcare workers (HCWs). Systematic studies of occupational risks for COVID-19 in the context of community risks are difficult and have only recently started to be reported. Ongoing quality improvement studies in various locales and within many affected healthcare institutions are needed. A template design for small-scale quality improvement surveys is proposed. Such surveys have the potential for rapid implementation and completion, are cost-effective, impose little administrative or workforce burden, can reveal occupational risks while taking community risks into account, and can be repeated easily with short time intervals between repetitions. This article describes a template design and proposes a survey instrument that is easily modifiable to fit the particular needs of various healthcare institutions in the hope of beginning a collaborative effort to refine the design and instrument. These methods, along with data management and analytic techniques, can be widely useful and shared globally. The authors' goal is to facilitate quality improvement surveys aimed at reducing the risk of occupational infection of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Guidelines as Topic , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Quality Improvement/standards , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
13.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 33(1)2021 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-248221

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has required health systems to change much faster than normal. Many staff have experienced training in quality improvement and patient safety methods which can be used to support the design of new systems and to accelerate learning about new and adapted practices. This article sets out the principles of quality improvement and patient safety science, applying them in a selection of approaches, methods and tools, which may be useful in crisis situations such as the current pandemic. The article also makes reference to several resources which may be of use to those keen to advance their knowledge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Patient Safety/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Group Processes , Humans , Models, Psychological , Pandemics , Quality Improvement/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL